Reply to: Output to CHM – trial initial impressionsOctober 25, 2010 at 5:02 pm
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
As I was writing my post I thought it must be mentioned somewhere in the docs (thanks for pointing out exactly where), but my point is that I should be able to download and run – if it needs something additional, it should offer the chance of installing it there and then, or at least warn me in big letters that I've not got it installed – not many people (myself included) read much of the docs before installation! 🙂
Like I said, just some feedback to make the user experience a little better – I've always found that people new to a product are the best people to see deficiencies – once you've become accustomed to the product, you can't see problems with it because you know how it's expected to be done (well, that's certainly true of software I write).